Sunday, June 19, 2022

Thanks, Dad

 Happy Father's Day to all you dads out there, the ones who taught your kids how to hit the cutoff man and execute a pick-and-roll and throw a football that didn't quack like a wounded duck, and also to form sentences that didn't sound as if they were written by a German shepherd.

("Your dad never got around to that last, did he?" you're saying now)

In other words, thanks to all of you for being an inspiration, and also for the comic relief when you spend ten minutes trying to figure out why the goldang microwave won't goldang come on, only discover it wasn't goldang plugged in.

If nothing else, your kids will thank you for expanding their vocabulary.

I could write some stuff about my own dad, who never taught me to be athlete but passed on to me the value of honesty and responsibility, and a reverence for the past and its lessons. But I realize I said it all 3 1/2 years ago, when Dad died at the full measure of 91 years.

Here's what I wrote then. And enjoy the day, Dads:

Things passed along

"Swing level," the tall man says. "Don't try to kill it."

He is bent at the waist, his eternally angular frame assuming the rough approximation of a question mark. His right arm is extended. In his hand is a baseball.

Standing considerably closer to him than the requisite 60 feet, 6 inches is a speck of a boy who looks as if he were rush ordered from the Department of Runty Kids With Really Huge Glasses. The bat on his shoulder is almost as big as he is. It is high summer in Indiana; some indeterminate evening, twilight dawdling along as twilight tends to do in high summer, man and boy in the backyard of their neat brick home on the southeast side of Fort Wayne.

The man shakes the ball.

"Swing level," he says again. "Don't try to kill it."

He lobs the ball gently.

The boy swings level.

Above the ball. Below the ball. Above the ball again. On and on, the man shaking the ball and lobbing it, the boy swinging and missing.

"Swing level," the man keeps saying. "Don't try to kill it ..."

***

My father never raised no major leaguers.

His only son was comically small for his age and couldn't see a damn thing without the glasses that sat on his face like a pair of binoculars, the lenses thicker than the bottom of a Coke bottle. Baseballs ducked and ran for cover when he swung. Dribbling a basketball was like trying to dribble Jupiter. He couldn't throw a football 20 yards, and when he did hunters all over northeast Indiana went for their guns to bring down that quacking duck.

I was no athlete, in other words. I had the fine motor skills of a tree stump, and my track coach -- the only sport I ever quasi-participated in -- once damned me with this faint praise: "You've got great form. If you had any endurance, you could be pretty good."

So there were no "Field of Dreams" moments between us, father and son lobbing a baseball back and forth in the gloaming. Mostly this was because I couldn't catch a baseball with a three-state dragnet. And, partly, it was because my father was never more than a nominal sports fan.

Oh, he'd watch baseball or football or mostly basketball, because, at 6-foot-3, he played high school basketball the way most 6-3 boys in Indiana played it in the 1940s. For a time he was fascinated with tennis, mainly because he loved watching Bjorn Borg play. But we never really bonded over sports; the supreme irony of our mutual lives, and something we frequently laughed about, is that I grew up to be a sportswriter.

We will laugh about it no more, sadly. Dad left us yesterday in the skinny hours of morning, going peacefully in his sleep. At 91, he lived his full measure of years and more, and few men ever lived them better or more worthily. He was not famous or weighted with earthly honors or a great man as the world measures these things, but he was true and honest and everyone who ever knew him loved him. And surely there is greatness in that.

And, like all true and honest fathers, he will endure because of the things he passed along to his children.

If we never mastered the art of swinging level, for instance, we mastered other things, as father and son. Because of Dad, a former Civil War re-enactor, I am a Civil War nerd of the first order; his old re-enactor's uniform hangs in my hall closet, and I squeeze into it every Halloween (I am neither as tall nor as angular as the old man). Every few springs, alone, I make a pilgrimage to Gettysburg or Shiloh or some other Civil War haunt. That is my father's legacy.

So, too, is a general reverence for history, for the lessons it teaches that human beings routinely and blithely ignore, and for its relics. They are all around my house, these days; on the bookshelf in our den are Civil War minie balls and a chunk of Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain's wall and a tiny round button from a World War I German grenade, salvaged from the torn earth of the Western Front.

On another shelf is my Dad's old baseball glove. In one corner leans a cut-down hockey stick that belonged to his father, its age-dark handle wrapped in ancient black tape. And in the kitchen, on one wall in the breakfast nook, hangs a narrow knickknack shelf.

On it, carefully placed, are a clutch of wooden blocks and a glass jar of marbles. Scattered among them are several small lead soldiers, striking belligerent poses. Old campaign buttons -- two of them Roosevelt/Wallace buttons dating to 1944 -- lie at their feet, as if the soldiers were tasked with guarding them.

That shelf, and those things, have been there for so long I rarely notice them anymore. But in the pre-dawn darkness yesterday, when the phone rang and the word came that Dad was gone, I found myself looking at them again. And thanking God I'd known a man who treasured such things, and how lucky I was to be his son.

"Swing level," the tall man says. "Don't try to kill it ..."

Always, Dad. Always. 

-- Nov. 17, 2018

Saturday, June 18, 2022

The Gray Lady, and gray areas

 There's nothing the Blob loves more than self-proclaimed bastions of free speech muzzling free speech. Hypocrisy makes my heart glow like a Yule log ember.

OK. So that's completely not true.

Actually, as a former bastioneer (or something) myself, it annoys the bejeezus out of me. Because the people doing the muzzling are people who ought to know better, but don't. Instead, they cling to notions of journalistic purity that read like they came from the quill of John Peter Zenger himself.

In other words, they're, like, 400 years out of date.

Which brings us to the latest anachronistic bastioneers (really like that word), the poobahs at the New York Times. After buying the floundering sports website The Athletic, they declared it would be an independent entity under the Times umbrella, and thus there would be no substantive changes in its content or philosophy. That of course was a lie.

Because now the Times has announced Athletic staffers will be banned from expressing their political beliefs on social media or any other platform. This presumably includes social or political commentary that pertains to sports (because the intersection is well-populated these days), but the Times says, well, no ... kinda ... maybe.

Thus does the Gray Lady wander into a vast gray area.

I mean, if, for instance, Steve Kerr sounds off again about gun control, are Athletic writers allowed to comment and/or expand upon it? Are they allowed to do more than simply serve up a lot of neutered pablum without pointing out that certain politicians of a certain bent are taking X amount of dollars from the NRA? And if they're not allowed to do that, what's the point of addressing what Kerr has to say?

And what about anthem protests against racial injustice? Will staffers be allowed to comment on those in any substantive way? If a Republican Vice-President conducts another staged walkout vis-a-vis Mike Pence at that Colts game a few years back, will they be allowed to comment on that?

"I don't personally view matters of race as politics," Times muckety Paul Fichtenbaum responded to questions about this.

Race isn't political? 

The hell is this man talking about? And from what planet is he talking about it?

The skinny is, this is destined to be one glorious quagmire, and it's entirely of the Times creation. They've so twisted themselves in knots trying to maintain outmoded notions of objectivity they come off sounding as gelded as Funny Cide. 

Lately, that's sounded like this: Let us not unduly piss off any political party, or that party's supporters, endeavoring always to treat all views with equal respect and gravity, no matter how utterly batshite they are.

That's a trifle more wordy than the Times current motto, "All The News That's Fit To Print." But it certainly seems more accurate these days.

Which would seem to be important for a newspaper, after all.


Friday, June 17, 2022

Champs to chumps to champs

 They confounded us to the last, those scamps. Seriously, was there anyone out there who didn't think the Golden State Warriors were sure to lose Game 6 in Boston last night, simply because these ebb-and-flow NBA Finals seemed destined to go the full seven?

But the Celtics, looking exhausted, couldn't hang, and Steph Curry became Steph Curry again after that weird interlude as Stiff Curry, and the Warriors rolled, 103-90. Not a lot of drama to attend the clinching moment of an odyssey that was all drama.

The Warriors have now won four titles in the last seven years, which sounds as dynastic as it gets these days until you realize how they did it. In between titles three and four, see, they went from the presidential suite to the sub-basement and back again. They broke up a Superfriends champ and put together another, entirely different sort of champ four years later.

This was no Steph/Klay/Draymond/KD juggernaut, after all. It was Steph and a lot of changeable parts -- some nights Draymond, some nights Andrew Wiggins, some nights a combination of Steph and Wiggins and Jordan Poole and assorted others pieces, like Gary Payton II, Otto Porter Jr. and Kevon Looney. 

"A collective season," Klay Thompson characterized it last night.

And very different from the Warriors' last title run in 2017. 

This time Curry broke his hand and Thompson was still struggling to regain his form after not one but two devastating Achilles tears, and Golden State didn't have a healthy roster until the playoffs. And there were no Superfriends around to help.

That ended when Kevin Durant left for the Nets after the 2018 Finals loss to the Raptors, which ended in Game 6 with Thompson suffering the Achilles injury that would keep him sidelined for a year. Two years later, in 2019-20, Golden State was the worst team in the NBA, going 15-50 in the Covid bubble year.

Two years after that, they're back on top again.

And in the deciding game, the Collective was its collective self. Draymond Green finally awoke from his series-long slumber with a classic Draymond line: 12 points, 12 rebounds, eight assists, two steals, two blocks. Wiggins contributed 18 points, six boards, five assists, four steals and three blocks. Poole scored 15 off the bench. And Curry?

Three nights after an unaccountably horrid Game 5 -- 16 points on 7-of-22 shooting, including zippo-for-9 from the 3-point arc -- he was back to being Steph again, going for 34, seven and seven on12-of-21 shooting and 6-of-11 from Threeville. It mirrored his legendary Game 4 in Boston, when he went for 43 points, seven threes and 10 rebounds to keep Golden State from going down 3-games-to-1 in the series.

Instead, the Warriors never lost again, winning Games 4, 5 and 6, all by double digits, to clinch the title. Champs to chumps to champs in five seasons.

You can't quite call that a dynasty. But you can surely call it something.




Thursday, June 16, 2022

An outbreak of reason

 The U.S. Open began this morning where Francis Ouimet essentially gave birth to American golf 109 years ago -- The Country Club in Brookline, Mass. -- and that must have been a great relief to a bunch of crabby guys in logo caps and moisture-wicking polo shirts.

Finally, no more questions about the LIV!

Which put the LIV golfers out of sorts earlier this week, because they didn't want to hear questions like, I don't know, why are you taking money from people who bonesaw journalists and slaughter women and children? Especially when the PGA Tour you're supposedly trying to reform by doing so has already made you richer than God?

Gotta say, the LIV guys didn't react well to that. They bitched and moaned about it, mostly, saying the questions should be about the U.S. Open, and how dare you media people detract from the Open by asking us questions for which we have no decent answers?

Of course, they were only be asked those questions because it was the first opportunity most of the media there had had a chance to ask them. Let's face it, the LIV guys have been pretty adept at ducking the bulk of American media. So they really had no one but themselves to blame for all the LIV questions.

However ...

However, there was one golfer who stood out among the whiners. His name was Jon Rahm.

Rahm's one of the non-defectors, and when asked questions about the LIV, what he said was that while he saw the appeal,  he didn't think 54 holes with no cut and a shotgun start was real tournament golf. Although he didn't use the word, the implication was that the LIV was just a series of high-stakes exhibitions in which even the guy who finishes last cashes in big.

Which is what it is, basically.

Oh, yeah. And about that cashing in big part?

"Would our lifestyle change if I got $400 million?" Rahm asked rhetorically. "No. It would not change one bit. Truth be told, I could retire right now with what I made (on the PGA Tour), and I'd live a very happy life and not play golf again."

Outbreaks of reason like this are rare things, and this one is especially valuable because it gets at the heart of the LIV matter. Which is, how high can you stack the dough before it basically becomes Monopoly money? Isn't there a point where more is just more of the same?

I mean, golfers like Phil Mickelson or Dustin Johnson, they're already set for life. Hell, their kids are set for life. So why take the Saudis' blood money, and all the grief that attends it? 

Yeah, it's an obscene amount of cash, but after awhile it's just pieces of paper with pictures of presidents and the like. Now, maybe, as a friend of mine suggested, it's easy to say you wouldn't take it until it was actually there for the taking. And maybe that's true.

But I'd like to think if I'd already made, say, $200 million on the PGA Tour, I'd say, "Yeah, it's a lot of money. But I've GOT a lot of money. So, nah."

'Course, that's just me. Oh, and Jon Rahm.

Not bad company to keep.

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

And now, the boys of summer

 The Stanley Cup Final begins tonight out in Colorado, and that's a bit surprising. I mean, we're only halfway through June. Usually these things don't start heating up until the Fourth of July.

I'm being sarcastic, of course, and a bit geezerish, coming perilously close to sentences that begin "Back in my day ..." But it's a different world now, and refrigeration is better. And so the Stanley Cup Final can be anytime or anywhere the NHL decides it can be.

Shoot. Sometime in the misty future, the Final probably will pit the Quito, Ecuador, Ice Qs vs. the Lesser Antilles Canadiens, the latter having relocated from Montreal at some point. And they'll play all the games on the equator in the middle of August.

For now, it's the Avalanche vs. the two-time defending champs from Tampa, and even though I think the Avs are the better team, I'm picking the Lightning. This is because I think the three-peat is inevitable now that the Bolts have reached the Final again, and also because they've been harder to stamp out than velvet leaf.

After all, the Rangers had 'em down 2-0 in the conference finals, and the Lightning proceeded to win the next four games to win in six. And in the first round, Toronto led 3-2, only to see the Lightning win the last two games to advance -- including a Game 7 in Toronto, as the Maple Leafs Leafed it up again.

So ... yeah. I'm picking the Lightning. Three straight for Stammer (Steve Stamkos) and Pointer (Brayden Point) and Roons (Patrick Maroon) and Vasy (Andrei Vasilevskiy).

You know. All those boys of summer.

A programming reveal

 Occasionally I run into people who still believe the "news" part of Fox News, and I'm always astounded. It's fascinating to me how easily people are taken in by even the most obvious propaganda, the more outlandish the better.

In those moments it becomes clear to me how Stalin and Hitler and every other murderous goon in history was able to sell what he sold to the citizenry. It seems if the citizenry wants to believe something badly enough, no matter how ridiculous, it will believe it.

Like, that Fox "News" is actually a legitimate news source, and not, you know, an American version of Tass or Pravda.

The boys and girls at Fox proved it again the other day, when they deliberately manipulated reality during a broadcast of a San Francisco Giants game. To recognize Pride Month (for which the official Fox position is "Ewwww"), the Jints had transgender "Jeopardy!" champion Amy Schneider throw out the first pitch.

That's not what Fox viewers saw, however.

What they saw was NASCAR driver Kurt Busch throwing out the first pitch. It actually happened a year ago, but Fox didn't bother telling its viewers that. They just used it to promo an upcoming NASCAR race.

That was their cover, anyway, even if it was skimpier than a Sports Illustrated swimsuit  model's duds. And of course it wasn't "news." It was in fact exactly the opposite of "news." 

Look. I get it. The folks who run Fox News don't like transgenders. They think they're creepy and out to take over women's sports. They also aren't fond of those awful gay people, who want to corrupt our children with their awful gay-y ways. It's why they spend so much time reporting on nefarious teachers "grooming" schoolkids for gayhood, even if  it's almost entirely mythical.

I just wish they'd be upfront about what they're doing, and who they are.

I wish they'd all just come out and say what some of them pretty much already do -- namely, that they don't like transgenders and gays, and that they think they're all going to burn in hell, and that they're not legitimate members of American society but sick aberrations who should be marginalized at best.

At least that would be honest. 

If not exactly news.

Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Caught out again

 Greetings this morning from soon-to-be Dryer Vent, In., where Dorothy and Toto blow away in 98-mph wind gusts one minute, and The 98 Degrees of Heat Index Hell are apparently on deck the next.

That's your local weather in a nutshell after last night's apocalyptic storm, and here's hoping you made it through without a tree falling on you. But if you think this is God punishing northeast Indiana for continuing to send Jim Banks to Congress, imagine what it's like being a prisoner-of-the-moment right now.

These NBA Finals are playing unshirted hell with those folks. And not even apologizing for it.

I mean, after Steph saved the Warriors the other night with that 43-point masterwork in Boston, the interwhatsis was actually debating whether he belonged in the same breath with Bird, Magic, MJ et al as the greatest clutch player in NBA playoff history. Talk was heard that he was absolutely, without-a-doubt the best player in the NBA, and that he's never gotten his due as such.

You can probably make a case for the latter. The former ... well, as they say, opinions vary. And sometimes they vary right on out to the intersection of Hey, Wait A Minute and Let's Pump The Brakes A Tad There, Sparky.

Especially after last night.

Because, see, after all that chatter from the prisoners-of-the-moment, they got caught out again. Steph the Great went out and became Steph the Mortal: Sixteen points on 7-of-22 shooting, and negatory-for-9 from the 3-point arc -- the first time in 233 games he hadn't made at least one three. It was left to Andrew Wiggins (26 points, 13 boards) and Klay Thompson (21 points, 5-of-11 from the arc) to save the day for the Warriors and send them back to Boston with a chance to wrap up the title in six games.

The prisoners-of-the-moment are probably thinking that will happen, the silly gooses.

The Blob is saying what probably will happen is a vengeful Steph will go off -- a 30-spot, perhaps, with six or seven threes -- but the Celts somehow will scrape together a win anyway. And it'll be back to San Francisco for Game 7.  

Where the Dubs will raise the trophy in front of the home folks. Write it down.