We're not a week into the wrapper-fresh season yet, and the Blob already thinks baseball -- the most over-stat-ted game in the world of games -- needs a new stat.
I think MLB should add ABSW to WAR and PEACE and all the other analytics that so fascinate baseball nerds.
"What the heck is ABSW, Mr. Blob?" you're asking now.
Well, it stands for "Automated Ball-Strike Wins", and it would measure every MLB team's success in utilizing the newfangled ABS system to challenge a plate ump's call. It's just like batting averages, except in this case it would be second-guessing averages.
"'Automatic Ball-Strike Wins'," you're saying now. "Would that be before or after replacement?"
Stop it.
No, what got me thinking about this was what happened in the Yankees-Mariners game last night, which the M's won 2-1. It was the Pinstripes' first loss of the infant season, but get this: They went 5-for-5 in ABS challenges.
Five times a Yankee said, "Yeah, you missed that one, ump." Five times the ABS system backed him up.
The plate ump in this case was Mike Estabrook, and he must have hated that. In fact, I'm guessing every umpire in MLB despises ABS. They must hate it worse than Sarah Conner hated all those Terminators.
"(Bleeping) robots," I imagine them grumbling. "Job's tough enough as it is without (bleeping) Data looking over our shoulders. (Bleep). Why can't Captain Picard just shove him out an airlock or something? Make it so, (bleep), yeah."
Sorry, boys (and now, girls). But Jean-Luc ain't comin' to your rescue.
You're stuck with your robot umps, and God help us if it ever goes beyond that. All it'll take is your clean-hitter hitting an 0-for-31 slump, and XLP Model 34 will be replacing him in the lineup.
Until then ...
Until then, XLP Model 34 will be limited to embarrassing MLB umps. Or enraging players and managers by saying, "Nah, Blue got it right this time."
At which point Earl Weaver will come out of the dugout and kick dirt on XLP Model 34.
Man. How great would THAT be?